<b..but muh UPA
>but after watching the same artstyle for a fiftieth time it gets boring and tedious
So you got a hateboner for UPA because you watched it so many times to the point you hate it, autistic moron. As I've said before UPA wasn't the greatest, but it was decent and way better than current shit.
<the first two are fine
All of them are fine you pretentious faggot.
<I'm not defending modern crap like AT or SU
That wasn't the point you illiterate idiot, the point was you saying UPA is bad as current Calarts/beansmile shit is complete bollocks.
<because the people working on them are mediocre, not because of the technique employed and thinking otherwise is stupid
<technological advancements have no meaning nor impact
It's both, you disingenuous retard; motion tween-crap will easily let you move badly constructed design, CGI will easily allow you to add greeble, digital painting would allow to add as many colors as you'd like without having to consider paint budget, etc.
<The difference between digital and cel is the difference between a mechanical and an electrical typing machine
No, a good comparison would be between traditional (hand) sculpting to 3D sculpting. Your comparison is stupid because there's little to no difference between the capabilities/limitations of these machines.
Message too long. Click
to view full text.