This is my dream.
My opinion is that only Monarchy will make a cessation of these divisions. What we see with political parties is the by-product of democracy and oligarchy, that being the many and the petty elite, who love to pointlessly dabble in their partisanships and cause division. Between the many and the few, it is only monarchy that will bring unity. It is only monarchy that can break these political parties and bring them a better identity, and only the personal rule (that some call autocracy) that will liberate people from the ultimate divide between father and son, and these superficial political differences.
>For she accompanies and attends revered kings Whomever the daughters of mighty Zeus honor and see being born from kings nurtured by Zeus, upon his tongue they pour dew sweeter than honey and from his mouth flow soothing words. All the people look to him as he decides between opposing claims with straight judgments. He addresses them without erring and quickly and knowingly ends a great quarrel. For this reason, kings are wise, because for people injuring one another in assembly, they end actions that call for vengeance easily, appeasing the parties with soft words. As he walks in the marketplace, they glorify him as if a god with soothing deference, and he stands out in the gathering.
This is explicitly what makes Monarchy the best unity in comparison to democracy and oligarchy.
Politicalization is not such a bad thing in itself, but there is a strong corruption of it in political parties today. It is a great thing when people feel in tangent with the body-politic, and they finally have a functioning political framework. It is greatly fulfilled with the royal bond, because it ideally should make them like one big family... and nothing like this kinship and loyalty facilitates grievances between people.
I talked to leftists on this issue, between comradeship and familial division, whether the democratic greater good matters more than your family... however, with a royal monarchy, if we could have it like a great household, make every comrade like a kin, then it would better.
Because comradeship is good, but familial loyalty has qualities better... if monarchy could provide greater unity and make all like kin, then this would be like a comradeship unparalleled.
This is what monarchists want from obedience and loyalty, when it comes to accepting a monarchy, that they aren't just passively obeying, but they must have kinship... the same way you wouldn't kill your own kin and family so easily... because despite your differences, and despite your political leniency, doing that would be an injustice.
>"If we consider the household, whose end is to teach its members
to live rightly, there is need for one called the pater-familias, or
for some, one holding his place." -Dante
>My old home, the Monarchy, alone, was a great mansion with many doors and many chambers, for every condition of men." -Joseph Roth
This is something I think North Korea understands, tbh. If there is one good thing to say about North Korea, they have achieved this from my pov. It's not about nationalism for me, neither about socialism, but through monarchy political unity is possible.
Monarchy is a better politicalization, and a better personal connection with people at large, through the monarch, and through themselves in tandem and towards their goals. This is hard for most people to understand, and it might not be understood even in royal states today, but the potential is there.
When there is one ruler, there is one unity, and one who doesn't divide himself. The structure itself denies political hampering found in these institutions... because the monarch is a personal ruler and has personal wisdom. It is a monarch that provides leadership and acts for the common good in ways that the majority and the minority cannot act.