>What's the point of living if you cannot marry cute young girls? Are whores enough for you?
Not only is that completely besides my point (which is that regardless of much you view yourself as right, your stance is typically considered perverse and morally objectionable, making your lack of OPSEC even more foolish), the fact that you can marry "cute young girls" that aren't children
, the fact that there's much more to marriage than marrying a girl that's young and cute (you're unlikely (but not absolutely won't be) to be romantically and sexually attracted to a genuinely ugly and/or old person, but your marriage would mean a lot more to you if it's on the proper foundation and not solely on her being good-looking and "fresh"), and
the fact that you're disingenuously labelling the only
alternatives to your preferred child brides to be the adult-aged whores in western countries (presumably as a way to bolster your argument by ignoring whatever supposedly small amount of adult-aged, non-slutty
women are out there) completely crumbles your argument away, and demonstrates that getting into an actual argument with you on this would probably just be a pervert making poor arguments to justify his position of being in favor of adult men marrying little girls; in short, a waste of time.
>Were the French philosophers foolish when they signed their anti-age-of-consent petition in the 70s?
From what I understand of the situation, yes.
In any case, I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this as you seem like an insufferable opponent to have an argument with (misunderstood a seemingly obvious point to be saying something I wasn't and created a false dichotomy between child brides and the culture of encouraged sluttiness in the west) about something that's veering completely out of technology, especially since the reasons against your position seem rather obvious and I see no real way for you to make a strong case in favor of it that isn't just
>"muh roasties/whores" (false dichotomy)
>"there's nothing with marrying cute young girls" (omitting a crucial detail in your argument, probably to try and make it more palatable).
>whataboutism (as if Muslims having child brides (and statutory rape) in their culture justifies you having a similar position, albeit with presumably no religion you personally believe in to justify it spiritually (not to mention that you've seemingly never outright condoned having sex with said child bride while they're still a minor, and I don't want to put words in your mouth))
As I said before, despite my disgust at your position, even if that woman and I may agree on your views being perverse, I suspect that she may only care because she saw an opportunity to use you as a stepping stone by making a victim out of a relatively easy target (presumably popular project lead on an open-source game who condones child brides who has poor enough OPSEC to have his ideas be traced back to him, and probably even admitted that those were his posts) for what I imagine could be significant gains in popularity and traffic (significant enough for her to consider this a worthy endeavor, anyway; I doubt she'd satisfied with just sacrificing you
on the proverbial altar). As a result, I'm hardly cheering for that woman for using your potentially-ruined reputation to boost herself up. She ought to be punished or still
not garner an immense amount of traffic towards her projects (making this effort at least fruitless for her, even if
she successfully managed to make you a pariah in the indie game development scene (not like it would be squeaky-clean without you, I imagine there's a significant amount of just-as-bad or way-worse indie devs when it comes to a position like yours)).