>You are redrawing the lines to get the results you want. Fst values map pretty neatly with geographic distance, so trying to compare the diversity of differently sized landmasses is at least dubious.
Even if that was true nya~, what's your point la~? Whether the diversity of the Aryan race, the clay from which the lesbian catgirl Herrenrasse will be shaped, is the result of the reflection of the green rays of the black sun within our veins or the distance between Gibraltar and Sverdlovsk is irrelevant to the very silly notion that we are at any risk of inbreeding without an influx of arabs and other genetic trash nya~.
>Like north africa and europe are closer together than some parts of china are to each other, so of course there has been way more historical genetic interchange.
Nya~, somewhere like Sicily might be the closest thing to a genetic mean between Europeans and north Africans, but la~, it's still nowhere close to actually being one. Regardless nya~, the actual distance between race A and race N is unimportant so long as you can consistently isolate them la~, something which is unarguably true today nya~
>Turks and greeks are very closely related for obvious reasons, They actually aren't very related at all nya~, most Turks are mutt descendants of ghazi warrior migrants and Anatolians who were culturally Hellenized, but were not significantly racially assimilated by the Greeks. The gradual erosion of urbanization in inland Anatolia due to Muslim raids and the nomadic lifestyle of Turkic migrants after Manzikert, and especially after the collapse of the Sultanate of Rum, exacerbated this and resulted in modern Turks being a bunch of mongrels with varying degrees of Asiatic admixture held together by phony culture and religion la~
>but still somehow one is genetically desireable and other isn't
Because one is white and the other is a genetic potpourri of inbred, asiatic rapeapes nya~. Although la~, it is true that religion plays a part in racial identification. Take the Bosnians nya~, I would be surprised if they significantly differed from their neighbors, particularly the Serbs, and yet /pol/ would only begrudgingly see them as white, if at all la~
>For example imagine if the ozone hole wasn't fixed. That adds a strong selection pressure for more melanin because skin cancer may kill you. Then white europe would just have to deport everyone after some time, even if they have only white ancestors.
This is very silly nya~, if you look at the fathers of Nazi racial theory, like Gunther, Chamberlain and Rosenberg, skin color was only one factor used to judge whiteness and was often not the most important. Skin color being the main determinant of race is largely an American phenomenon la~, like in this funny excerpt from Ben Franklin
>Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.