/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 2.0.

Global Moderator Recruitment is OPEN!

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Be sure to visit /polarchive/ for file libraries Remember to archive all links, and videos should be attached to posts or using a front end

(475.92 KB 1366x2092 pmq2.jpg)

Explain this Anonymous 07/29/2020 (Wed) 23:07:17 No. 1238
>12 year old woman cannot consent >male infant can consent to circumcision Explain this.
>>8877 in your case? Without a doubt
>>8874 Having sex with someone isn't ruining them, but mutilating their genitals so that they cannot have sex as effectively IS ruining them.
>>8885 Uh, that would be in everyone's case numb nuts. Or perhaps I should say "numb dick" because you probably have to stroke it as hard as you can with a gallon of lube to feel anything after most of the sensitive parts were hacked off in service of the Magical Sky Fairy.
>>8886 >Having sex with someone isn't ruining them, but mutilating their genitals so that they cannot have sex as effectively IS ruining them. We have to fucking destroy the government, jews and antipedos, we have to murder, we need explosions
>pedophilia is ok liberals pls go.
>>1238 I've never met a 12 year old girl who would marry me. Not that I've proposed to a 12 year old girl or anything like that ever, heh.
>>9299 >I've never met a 12 year old girl who would marry me. How do you know that? 12 year old girls are romantic, not degenerate like adult whores who demand wealth to marry you and will never love you. All adult women are prostitutes, their marriage is transaction-al.
>>7281 >Id:000000 how?
User was banned for failing to lurk for 10 years
>>9318 marriage has always been transactional. the difference is that back then there was a method by which we culturally ensured that both parties would keep their end of the transaction, but now women are not obliged to keep their end while men are forced with the entire weight of the law to keep theirs. the female end of the deal is optional. and this is why western civilization is over. birthrates will continue to decline as the "inferiors" keep breeding on your dime until there's no one to keep the infrastructure functioning and the west devolves into the mad-max post-apoc future. if you're married in 2021 you're a fucking retard playing russian roulette, and i wish the best to all of you, but statistically many of you are going to get the loaded chamber. >>9295 >>9299 age of consent is a ploy to artificially boost the sexual marketplace value of used up and infertile women. modern women are ugly and masculine, the only femininity left in this civilization is on children and teenagers so they have to make it illegal. and of course, the cucks and the simps who just want to be part of the "social group" will defend it with rage and irrational appeals to majority.
>>1796 What's the source for the video?
>>9563 How dare this person be new. God I hope he gets humiliated and treated horribly and never comes back.
>>10263 It's not about being new, it's about being too stupid to lurk moar. A good user will never feel new because they'll be smart enough to lurk enough.
>>1238 Males are just that much smarter.
there is no such thing as a 12 year old "woman". That is a child
>>10343 think about when this starts sounding ridiculous: >there is no such thing as a 13 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 14 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 15 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 16 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 17 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as an 18 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 19 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 20 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 21 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 22 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 23 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 24 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 25 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 30 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 40 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 50 year old "woman". >there is no such thing as a 60 year old "woman".
Die pedophile fucking faggot
Society is hypocritical. Shocker.
(70.92 KB 640x428 OppositeDay.jpg)

>>10343 >torniggers are now the anti pedos
Why the hell would you bring up 12 year old girls specifically? Bro circumcision is fucked up and should not be done to babies either. You're taking the wrong side of the consistency argument. Instead of being against circumcision, you are for raping minors? Like wtf dude your brain is rotting. Get help.
>>10517 but, it shows that any society could accept anything. you would think if rape was normal in your society, you'd stand up. but you don't do shyt all about baby sexual torturers & mutilators (circucisers). you don't feel bad being around people who are okay with the practice.
>>10538 You will be surprised by what people can condition themselves to accept is good and just. So long as the authorities running the society is telling them that it's all OK, they will just conform and focus on meeting a minimum standard of personal comfort and security, which can be raised or lowered through gradations by the ruling class. It's a mass psychosis that is by about by totalitarian through the application of stress and fear. Foremost of which being the stress of social conformity and the fear that cones with losing the acceptance of what they perceive to be the majority of their society's populations.
>>8622 No point, it will probably got deleted, plus we all know what will be the replies
>>10517 statutory rape is retarded and you know it. if the girl feels comfortable, then no problem
>>7106 This. Jews are evil.
(39.08 KB 291x219 putjew4.jpg)

>>10918 Shalom. We are not evil. Our leaders rule the world. Because we have a soul. What about you?
hola
>>10926 The statements 'we are not evil' and 'our leaders rule the world' are mutually exclusive. The group that rules the world is therefore responsible for every bad thing that happens in the world. They would also be responsible for any good things that happen, but that's immaterial because good things don't fucking happen.
>>10926 kike retard
>>1459 This is terrifying stuff. Has the game been rigged from the start just because I was circumsized??
The best society works like this: >White (Christo-Gentile, West-European, Indo-Aryan, and Caucasoid-Europoid) Males (Genetically possessed of at least one Male Chromosome) are citizens and East-Asian Males are civilians. >Only these two categories of humans beings are legally considered people, living beings, or even as sentient, sapient, conscious or animate entities in the government's official capacity, this means that only they have any freedoms, rights, or protections in the eyes of the state and law, however, this also means that they are the only two categories of humans who have any legal accountability. >Citizens are different from civilians in that the citizens are able to serve in law enforcement or national defense, which is a requirement for eligibility to participate in the political processes or be employed by the government. >The status these two categories share, personhood, grants another power, the power to claim ownership of anyone or anything who does not hold the status of "person" if they are the first to possess them (meaning they are not owned by any other "persons"). >This includes all of those who are not White or East-Asian, and all of those who are Female, it also includes anything that is not alive (such as corpses), not human (such as animals), or not biological (such as pretty much anything else, with the sole exception of the entirety of the Earth, celestial objects, satellites, or other such cosmic phenomena). >This means that, among others, all females are slaves or pets, or property that just happens to be alive for a time, they are protected to a degree by the property rights of the person(s) who have ownership of them, in that as the property of another, any physical interaction directed towards them is illegal unless their owner consents to it, and even then only within the limits of what their owner consented to, and the owner can withdraw their consent to the action at any time. Naturally, if their owner consents to anything to be done with (or to) them they have no protections under the law from that, and of course, this also means that they have no protection from their master(s) whatsoever. >While this sounds terrible, it's not actually that bad, as most masters treat their property with respect so long as their property reciprocates, not only because the White and Yellow races are noble enough to do so, but also for more practical reasons. >Mistreatment of one's property is a disadvantage for the owner who does it, and whatever short lived cheap thrills they get from this does not make up for the long lived consequences of doing it, reproductive failure weeds out the genetic traits that produce such a psychology, social stigma ruins the lives of the abusive masters, resources are wasted and destroyed for a gain that doesn't justify the expenses, etc. >Even ignoring that, there is yet another more dire reason not to wantonly abuse one's property, and that is that slaves are not completely powerless against their masters, remember when I said that people are accountable for their actions? this means that slaves are not, but then, if a slave commits a crime, who suffers the punishment for that crime? the answer is that their masters do, and this means that a master assumes responsibility for whatever their slave is convicted of doing, and is punished for their actions in the place of their slave as a consequence. It is this risk that puts a lot of persons off from taking slaves (or pets, as all the rules that apply to slaves also apply to all other forms of animate and/or living varieties of property). >The life of a typical girl is thus quite simple, at birth, she is owned by her father, who raises her with the intent of giving ownership of her away to her husband once he finishes up his compulsory term of service to his country in enforcing the law and defending the nation, who was likely arranged for her when she was born by the fathers of her and her husband, when she has a daughter, that daughter will be the property of her husband, the whole life of the girl and her daughter will be lived under the protection and direction of her father and husband, most of it will be spent in the home, but a good deal of it will be spent out and about on tasks such as shopping, a good bit of influence for her will be in commanding the other slaves of her household, as she has power over them due to her higher status in the house, and in the fact that it is she who is in charge of her children's education and upbringing.It's pretty much going to resemble the arrangement of the middle ages. >Just as there could be fathers with many daughters, there could be husbands with many wives, same rules apply, but with a hierarchy, such as one that places wives of the same race as the husband over those of the other race, or the wives who came before over those who came after. >Under this system, evolution will take place, in both women and men, men will become better husbands and masters, while women became better wives and slaves. >Slaves of unperson races, and their descendants will be marked, such that their ancestry is always apparent, the mark will represent the unperson race to which they belong, jews get a six-point star with one point directed upwards, arabs get the same star, but smaller and over a crescent laying on it's back, and so on, over the generations, when all their racial traits have been mixed out, the mark will remain to tell them apart from purebred peoples, it will be said repeatedly that the jewish women will be the lowest of the human slaves, with only robots/ai, beasts, and the deceased below them, directly above her is the jewish man, and with the arabs above them both in the second place, and establishing a whole hierarchy of races based on how much of a pain in the ass that they were to Whites in the recent years before the new empire was founded. Here are the arguments: - Holy Bible has nothing against pedophilia or polygamy, like it does against all other sorts of activities, and besides it's a Christian tradition to ignore the Bible or to be ignorant of the Bible in the process of deciding what their idea of what is a Christian or Unchristian practice, for example, incest is prohibited but was practiced by Christians for a long time, including during it's most devout periods, wearing or worshiping a cross is both worshipping at the base of an idol and a graven image of the lord and his servants, not to mention all the times the lord's name is spoken in the process. - Both practices were a tradition that spanned the majority of European history, both Christisan and Pre-Christian. - The jews want to keep it illegal and hated, but also want to engage in it themselves as well as leave it as a special privilege for their pets to partake in, as a means of incentivizing them and controlling them, the only time they start advocating acceptance is when they want to take the heat off of someone they need to protect for their own purposes at the time. Like with nationalism, and imperialism, this must mean that it's something they know is good to have, and so wish to maintain exclusive control over this.
>>10343 4 year old teens exist though. Precocious puberty's a bitch. https://www.thecut(Please use archive.today)/2019/01/precocious-puberty-patrick-burleigh.html
>>11677 >Kikes pushing pedo propaganda is real life Fuck off
>>11682 If jews supported pedophilia in general rather than just for themselves and their shabbos goyim, it would be legal right now, there's nothing to stop them from making it legal, or from preventing those who engage in it from suffering consequences. But none of that has happened, why? because it's more useful to them to make it illegal and keep it that way, te culture they create has treated this stuff like the worst crime ever, and the only time they've broke from this was when their shabbos goys got exposed for making use of their jew-given kiddy-fiddling priviledges, also in hastening the indoctrination of children into homosexuality and transgenderism by simulating the traumatizing abuse most homos and trannies have gone through (the goal here is not acceptance of pedophilia as much as it is the promotion of anti-nataist behaviors like homophilia and becoming sterile). For most of human history, there was no such thing as "age of consent", even where rape was a crime, for most of that history age never factored into it, it's an age old European tradition to take a wife, concubine, or lover as young as possible, with age never arising as a question into the legitimacy of the pairing (nationality, religion, breeding, and class would be questioned, but never age). The prohibition of "pedophilia" is a very recent occurrence, and the concept of "pedophilia" as being some sort of defect (instead of natural human sexuality) is only slightly less recent. It's a trait justified by evolution. - by taking a partner as young as possible, a strong bond is formed by the younger to the older, resulting in a more loyal and stable relationship, which is good for ensuring your children are yours and not someone else's, and that the partner is invested in caring for your offspring, - furthermore, you will be the first to mate with them when they reach the age of fertility, and can max out the length of their fertile period for as many offspring as you can bear together, each child is a carrier of the genes of you and your partner, so more children means more chances for you to have grandchildren. - also, being in a relationship at a young age has a benefit before fertility hits, in that the younger has a chance to learn how to be a partner in a relationship before they produce children, and the act of sex is not something new to them by the time it becomes procreative, meaning they will be less put off by it at the time when it starts making babies. - look at the cultures that produce large families, they tend to have very permissive attitudes towards prepubescent children having sex, and little issue with taking multiple sexual partners for yourself. If there is a key component to the revival of a dying race, this would be it. If it were up to me the type of society I'd want would be the type I recently described in this thread, White (and Yellow) Males owning everything and everyone else, including White (and Yellow) Females, being able to do whatever they please with their property. It'd remove laws on the things that I do consider to be degenerate acts of mental sickness as well, such as incest, bestiality, and homophilia, but that's alright, because that's truly going to be just between the masters and their slaves. This would be a world conquered by White Males, meaning no other countries of humans to deal with, and the government will adopt a night-watchman minarchist state, but modified such that the NAP only applies to certain people (White and Yellow Males), and political power is only given to a subset of that population (White Males), the government only exists to enforce the law and defend the nation, just the bare necessities of government to do the bare minimum of government functions. Which means that the rest of the population will be free to live their lives truly unaffected by their actions, as there'd be no government intervention making it their problem, there'd be no government laws forcing them to associate with them or preventing them from disassociating from them (you won't have to bake the cake, and you wont need any justification as to who works for you or who you serve with your own goddamn business, because it's literally your own goddamn business, also you wont have to live around them, and can say whatever you like about them, such as calling the sick fuckers what they are - sick fuckers), no government schools forcing the children to learn about the degenerates and why they should be accepted as if they were just as good (if not better) than the mentally healthy, no taxes being given to pay for the consequences of degeneracy (meaning degenerates have to suffer the full brunt of the consequences themselves, perhaps serving as an incentive to not be such sick fucks), etc. I would make a law that homophilia is prohibited between persons (White Males and Yellow Males), but with one twist, if one of those involved in the activity reports it before it;s discovered by anyone else, they are treated as if they weren't involved and only the other involved parties are punished. Only acts that could transmit sexual diseases between the parties are counted as crimes. Also there'd be an age of consent for White and Yellow Males, the age being 25, and there is a harsher sentence for those who are above this age if they do acts of homophilia with those who are below it (oldfags get BTFO).
>>11692 > For most of human history, there was no such thing as "age of consent" That's because you were considered an adult with responsibilities by the age of 10, and very few people lived beyond their 40's (Unless they were at the highest of heights of society).


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply