The best society works like this:
>White (Christo-Gentile, West-European, Indo-Aryan, and Caucasoid-Europoid) Males (Genetically possessed of at least one Male Chromosome) are citizens and East-Asian Males are civilians.
>Only these two categories of humans beings are legally considered people, living beings, or even as sentient, sapient, conscious or animate entities in the government's official capacity, this means that only they have any freedoms, rights, or protections in the eyes of the state and law, however, this also means that they are the only two categories of humans who have any legal accountability.
>Citizens are different from civilians in that the citizens are able to serve in law enforcement or national defense, which is a requirement for eligibility to participate in the political processes or be employed by the government.
>The status these two categories share, personhood, grants another power, the power to claim ownership of anyone or anything who does not hold the status of "person" if they are the first to possess them (meaning they are not owned by any other "persons").
>This includes all of those who are not White or East-Asian, and all of those who are Female, it also includes anything that is not alive (such as corpses), not human (such as animals), or not biological (such as pretty much anything else, with the sole exception of the entirety of the Earth, celestial objects, satellites, or other such cosmic phenomena).
>This means that, among others, all females are slaves or pets, or property that just happens to be alive for a time, they are protected to a degree by the property rights of the person(s) who have ownership of them, in that as the property of another, any physical interaction directed towards them is illegal unless their owner consents to it, and even then only within the limits of what their owner consented to, and the owner can withdraw their consent to the action at any time. Naturally, if their owner consents to anything to be done with (or to) them they have no protections under the law from that, and of course, this also means that they have no protection from their master(s) whatsoever.
>While this sounds terrible, it's not actually that bad, as most masters treat their property with respect so long as their property reciprocates, not only because the White and Yellow races are noble enough to do so, but also for more practical reasons.
>Mistreatment of one's property is a disadvantage for the owner who does it, and whatever short lived cheap thrills they get from this does not make up for the long lived consequences of doing it, reproductive failure weeds out the genetic traits that produce such a psychology, social stigma ruins the lives of the abusive masters, resources are wasted and destroyed for a gain that doesn't justify the expenses, etc.
>Even ignoring that, there is yet another more dire reason not to wantonly abuse one's property, and that is that slaves are not completely powerless against their masters, remember when I said that people are accountable for their actions? this means that slaves are not, but then, if a slave commits a crime, who suffers the punishment for that crime? the answer is that their masters do, and this means that a master assumes responsibility for whatever their slave is convicted of doing, and is punished for their actions in the place of their slave as a consequence. It is this risk that puts a lot of persons off from taking slaves (or pets, as all the rules that apply to slaves also apply to all other forms of animate and/or living varieties of property).
>The life of a typical girl is thus quite simple, at birth, she is owned by her father, who raises her with the intent of giving ownership of her away to her husband once he finishes up his compulsory term of service to his country in enforcing the law and defending the nation, who was likely arranged for her when she was born by the fathers of her and her husband, when she has a daughter, that daughter will be the property of her husband, the whole life of the girl and her daughter will be lived under the protection and direction of her father and husband, most of it will be spent in the home, but a good deal of it will be spent out and about on tasks such as shopping, a good bit of influence for her will be in commanding the other slaves of her household, as she has power over them due to her higher status in the house, and in the fact that it is she who is in charge of her children's education and upbringing.It's pretty much going to resemble the arrangement of the middle ages.
>Just as there could be fathers with many daughters, there could be husbands with many wives, same rules apply, but with a hierarchy, such as one that places wives of the same race as the husband over those of the other race, or the wives who came before over those who came after.
>Under this system, evolution will take place, in both women and men, men will become better husbands and masters, while women became better wives and slaves.
>Slaves of unperson races, and their descendants will be marked, such that their ancestry is always apparent, the mark will represent the unperson race to which they belong, jews get a six-point star with one point directed upwards, arabs get the same star, but smaller and over a crescent laying on it's back, and so on, over the generations, when all their racial traits have been mixed out, the mark will remain to tell them apart from purebred peoples, it will be said repeatedly that the jewish women will be the lowest of the human slaves, with only robots/ai, beasts, and the deceased below them, directly above her is the jewish man, and with the arabs above them both in the second place, and establishing a whole hierarchy of races based on how much of a pain in the ass that they were to Whites in the recent years before the new empire was founded.
Here are the arguments:
- Holy Bible has nothing against pedophilia or polygamy, like it does against all other sorts of activities, and besides it's a Christian tradition to ignore the Bible or to be ignorant of the Bible in the process of deciding what their idea of what is a Christian or Unchristian practice, for example, incest is prohibited but was practiced by Christians for a long time, including during it's most devout periods, wearing or worshiping a cross is both worshipping at the base of an idol and a graven image of the lord and his servants, not to mention all the times the lord's name is spoken in the process.
- Both practices were a tradition that spanned the majority of European history, both Christisan and Pre-Christian.
- The jews want to keep it illegal and hated, but also want to engage in it themselves as well as leave it as a special privilege for their pets to partake in, as a means of incentivizing them and controlling them, the only time they start advocating acceptance is when they want to take the heat off of someone they need to protect for their own purposes at the time. Like with nationalism, and imperialism, this must mean that it's something they know is good to have, and so wish to maintain exclusive control over this.