/ss/ - Straight Shota

Ara Ara

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 2.0.

Be aware of the Fallback Plan

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Read the RULES before posting. Related boards: sm / loli / tot / delicious

(221.00 KB 1600x1123 9.jpg)
Meta Thread NotADemon Board owner 04/24/2021 (Sat) 05:07:47 No. 2
Thread for meta discussion of the /ss/ board, its moderation, and whatever else. Complain about the rules, request changes, call me mean names, etc. Rule 6 and any other rules related to discussion will be enforced much more loosely within this thread. Feel free to post any potential banners in this thread. Banner details: >Max size: 1MB >Current banners resolution: 300px wide by 100px tall; Not mandatory for banners to be this exact resolution, but would be much appreciated. Potential spoiler images are also welcome; No file size or resolution requirements for those but preferably less than 500px.
Edited last time by NotADemon on 05/26/2021 (Wed) 13:57:41.
>namefagging and using capcode while dumping porn What the fuck is it with porn BO's and doing this shit?
>>18 Apologies, I had just forgotten to logout/clear the name field before posting those dump threads. You're right, no reason to namefag unless it's relevant, I'll be more careful about that in the future
(42.43 KB 300x100 Untitled.png)
(3.63 MB 1280x1976 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2 Thanks for making the board friend, appreciate it heres a quick shitty one to help a bit. If I was better I'd make an animated one of the top half then transitions into the bottom half but maybe somebody else can!
(162.23 KB 600x200 3_Z.gif)
>>65 Realized 300x100 is way too small, so I've upped it to 600x200. Also, great idea for a banner, put together a gif like you asked, looks great :)
>>81 Dope! When I was cropping it I was thinking 300x100 was real small so that helps. I'll try to come up with other ideas since that one came out great!
(15.43 KB 300x100 do not reprint.jpg)
(30.85 KB 600x200 6_Text.jpg)
(44.51 KB 600x200 7_Text.jpg)
(149.22 KB 600x200 5_Text.png)
(68.62 KB 600x200 8_Text.jpg)
Whipped up and added a few more banners; I may was well post the rest of them that I haven't posted in this thread >>112 Added, thanks for the contribution :)
(195.09 KB 600x200 1_Text.png)
(48.00 KB 600x200 2_Text.jpg)
(53.15 KB 600x200 4_Text.jpg)
>>113 The rest
Give me the original images of these banners to see if I can make good 300x100 banners. By the way, BO, if you want to display the banners at their original resolution instead of being resized you can add #bannerImage {height: unset !important} to the board's custom CSS.
(120.35 KB 1307x1000 5_Base.jpg)
(159.89 KB 602x709 2_Base.jpg)
(221.00 KB 1600x1123 4_Base.jpg)
(1.31 MB 1778x921 1_Base.png)
(1.65 MB 1280x1100 3_Base.png)
>>115 >Give me the original images of these banners Have at it >if you want to display the banners at their original resolution instead of being resized you can add #bannerImage {height: unset !important} Thanks Note that 3_Base is the one that was made into a gif
(190.50 KB 1400x749 7_Base.jpg)
(251.89 KB 1012x1337 8_Base.jpg)
(306.96 KB 1700x1469 6_Base.jpg)
>>115 And the rest
(3.63 MB 1280x1976 3_Base.png)
>>115 Actual full image, didn't realize the one I had saved was cropped
(38.64 KB 300x100 shotamon.png)
(24.90 KB 300x100 icame.jpg)
(53.14 KB 300x100 couch2.png)
(54.88 KB 300x100 weird2.png)
(690.69 KB 300x100 kingopt.gif)
>>116 >>117 >>118 Alright, here are the banners.
(40.44 KB 300x100 orgy.jpg)
(36.05 KB 300x100 bathing.jpg)
(46.37 KB 300x100 pitlutena.jpg)
(32.76 KB 300x100 pitlutena2.jpg)
>>121 >>122 Goddamn, these are all great! Actual outlined and colored text that fits into the image, better framing as well, just great; Way better than my mspaint versions lol. Only one I have any qualms with is kingopt.gif, I feel like the panning up isn't quite as good as the sharp cut to the other frame of the fingering, as shown in >>81; again, I apologize for not giving the full uncropped image in my first reply. I'll get to setting these up, thank you very much for all your effort :)
Edited last time by NotADemon on 04/28/2021 (Wed) 03:06:38.
(132.74 KB 300x100 ssking_og_alt.gif)
(699.47 KB 300x100 ssking_v2.gif)
>>123 >Only one I have any qualms with is kingopt.gif, I feel like the panning up isn't quite as good as the sharp cut to the other frame of the fingering, as shown in >>81 In that case here's a modified version of you original "king" banner that includes a smoother transition between the two panels and makes them visible for the same amount of time (4s). Here's also an improved version of my original approach (reduced the image's size so the hand of the boy could be visible just like in your banner).>>123
>>124 That one's great! :) Added it just now Again, can't thank you enough for all your effort in making these
EPI content is no longer allowed; an EPI request thread was made a few days ago with content that could be interpreted in a court of law as content that is intended to be viewed by, or distributed to real minors. I'm certain that plenty of people consume that sort of content without any such intent but again, I'm not willing to take any risk like that. >no discussion of pedophilia, legality of child pornography, or age of consent. This rule is copied practically verbatim from the >>>/sm/ rules, and exists only to prevent thread from being derailed by either proclamations of the content in the thread/board being pedophilic, or by promotion/discussion of real world pedophilia. >Mods are hiding groomcord conspiracies! The people need to know! This reply was in response to the deletion of two messages that were conversing about real world pedophilia/grooming in the replies of the aformentioned EPI thread. I am strictly against real child grooming, and wil not allow any promotion or discussion of it on the board; One of the reasons for the new no EPI rule. Please let me know if you dislike any of the new rules, believe I'm wrong about something, want to call me a slur, etc. Just keep it inside the meta thread please. >OBSOLETED, SEE >>146 For starters 3DCG/SFM is no longer allowed, only 2D content is allowed. As of now this affects almost none of the content on the board, and may not be permanent. Any 3DCG content may put the board in jeopardy considering the "borderline material" clause in the global rules.
Edited last time by NotADemon on 05/26/2021 (Wed) 13:59:05.
>>129 >This reply was in response to the deletion of two messages that were conversing about real world pedophilia/grooming in the replies of the aformentioned EPI thread. I was just busting your balls. Though I did find the OP of that thread rather creepily specific, so I took the opportunity to mock his creepy topic in association with him talking about using groomcord.
>>129 >EPI content is no longer allowed What's that?
>>131 I should've elaborated on it a bit more in that reply, it's described in https://8chan.moe/ss/rules.html "Early Porn Introduction" i.e. straight shota imagery with captions/text/audio implying the content is intended to be viewed by minors, or distributed to minors. Does not include POV content from a fictional minors perspective.
>>132 thank god that shit was weird
>>129 There is absolutely nothing in that global rule clause that even IMPLIES it's talking about 3D content. In fact, the part that talks about "jailbait" would seem to indicate it means actual photos of actual children that are borderline on either age or content (aka: photos of children that could be interpreted as lewd or exploitative even if not obviously pornographic). Where did everyone jumping on the bandwagon of being wary of 3D art even come from? Anything official more than guesswork...? Aside from this, it seems every porn board has a different opinion on what level of "3D" CGI content is allowed. It's really dumb that anything other than "oh shit, I can't tell if this is actually a real photo of a real child" is disallowed. Even the divide between "2D" and "3D" is a vague one because literally all artwork is 2D pixels at the end of the day, so it doesn't make a difference whether it was made with blender or made with MS Paint. You're looking at a 2D computer screen, not a Star Trek holodeck - there IS NO ACTUAL 3D! Something being a CGI model is no reliable indicator of "realism", either. I've seen plenty of painted images that are stunningly realistic (and real paint on real canvas from the impressionist period, too), and as well seen tons of 3D models that looks like rubber dolls with neon hair. Granted, there are also problems with allowing someone authority to police content on a case-by-case basis, but surely it's better than blanket-banning a particular type of content for no reason.
>>139 >Where did everyone jumping on the bandwagon of being wary of 3D art even come from? Anything official more than guesswork...? 3DCG art is not only almost always complete fucking garbage, but it seems to consistently get latched onto by degenerate pedophiles. 3DCG could be banned just based on how fucking dogshit 99% of the content actually is. I would say 3DCG has enough creepy association with pedophiles by now that coupling that with the terrible quality is grounds to just avoid the content all together. Like with other retarded fetishes it seems pedophiles eat up 3DCG garbage simply because it veers closer to reality than good art that is more separated from reality. The enjoyment of the content is seemingly entirely based on pushing the 2D/3D barrier, rather than in the quality of the content itself. And that is when enabling those kinds of degenerates starts to become problematic and you get pedophiles openly talking about how much they want to molest children thinking they're in good company. >Granted, there are also problems with allowing someone authority to police content on a case-by-case basis, but surely it's better than blanket-banning a particular type of content for no reason. Curating content is a lot of work, and BO's do it for free. I think segregation of 3DCG from other boards is good. Someone should make a dedicated 3DCG board to contain the content. I suspect it would rapidly fill with detestable creatures trying to seek the thrill of pushing that 2D/3D barrier as far as they can take it.
>NO 3DCG/SFM Porn allowed yeah fuck this board and fuck you
800 3d loli images and no problems https://8chan.moe/delicious/res/184.html#footer
>>142 The existence of 800 3DPD images is a problem.
>>>/sm/ allows 3DCG, straight porn included, just saying. You could try making a 3DCG thread there and see how does it go. >>132 First time I hear that term, to be honest.
>>139 >>141 >>142 >>144 3DCG/SFM content is now allowed again, 3D rule has been reverted to match the >>>/sm/ 3D rule. The old ruling was excessive and unwarranted. >>140 >it seems to consistently get latched onto by degenerate pedophiles. This puts precisely into words why I originally banned 3D content; It can attract bad apples who may break rule 2. Banning 3D content entirely was excessive and overreaching, And I can always just enforce rule 2 to get rid of "pedophiles openly talking about how much they want to molest children" Notes: >Thread creators can explicitly say "No 3D" and I'll remove any 3D content posted in that thread >Possibility of in the future ruling that 3D content needs to be spoilered, thoughts?
(327.69 KB 1920x1749 32.jpg)
>>>/site/2332 >/ss/ changes the rule every day I've been called out lol In all honesty, sorry for the frequent rule changes; I'll try to be less autistic about it in the future. Unrelated, any thoughts on a dedicated 'request' thread?
>>150 I don't care, the board is new and its better to figure this shit out before it gets more people using it and it depends, requests for what? Just sources for pictures or you mean drawthreads or something else
>>188 Board's 3D rule changed, for the last time, I promise. Change was based on a recent post on /site/ by global mod Codexx regarding how global mods deal with 3D shota/loli content. >>>/site/2341 Relevant quotes: > If it looks realistic such that it looks real at first glance then it can't stay and US law treats that are identical to child porn. >If it depicts a real child in a 3D medium, it's my understanding that this is also illegal. >At the end of the day, none of us want to study CP to determine if it's a 3D render or not. Again, I intend for this to be the final change to the boards 3D rule. Since it's based on global moderation it should be all good.
Noticed some other boards linked to /ss/ in their 'board message', figured I should respond in kind & add links to those boards in this boards 'board message'. Also did some minor re-wording of rules, nothing really changed other than replacement of "images" with "media/content".
(30.12 KB 300x100 Tribal.jpg)
(212.24 KB 850x1077 BASE_Tribal.jpg)
Question for anons, do you think futanari should be required to be spoilered? Should it be allowed in threads that don't specify if they want futa in the thread? Switched default board CSS to 'Tomorrow' since it seemed easier on the eyes, if you have any thoughts about that change let me know. Also added 1 new banner, this time not made in MSPaint.
>>290 Don’t think any of the threads should be spoilered. Nothing hidden, maybe only extreme fetishes. For what is allowed where is something that’ll be an issue later when more people arrive. Best to keep the main themes in their own threads
>>189 That sounds good enough. There's nothing wrong with 3D being 3D, but there's a difference between 3D anime or an H-Game and dime a dozen "MAP pride" daz renders.
(135.48 KB 754x544 12.jpg)
Custom spoiler test
(15.88 KB 300x100 Frill.jpg)
(16.74 KB 300x100 Mario.jpg)
(239.25 KB 850x1202 BASE_Frill.jpg)
(179.13 KB 850x746 BASE_Mario.jpg)
Added 2 new banners
(19.41 KB 700x187 Hajimete no Okaa-san.png)
It's a bit wide, but conceptually feels like an /ss/ banner
(45.96 KB 300x100 Warning.jpg)
(853.99 KB 1130x1646 BASE_Warning.jpg)
>>395 Good idea, but unfortunately the text is a bit too dense to read at the current 300x100. For those interested, the full doujin is https://nhentai.net/g/149942/


Quick Reply
Extra
Delete
Report

no cookies?