Bear in mind, I'm not saying any of this is bad
. I'm reasonably certain that misandry is a necessary consequence of how the species works. I'm certainly not condemning anyone for it.
Hairless, beardless, slender, generally youthful. I think this confirms, rather than rebuts, my point.
>if you have an instinctive revulsion of men fucking each other in the ass it's because you have a revulsion of men
People don't have the same revulsion towards lesbians (except the mannish kind), aside from various mullahs, who are reliant on performative outrage for halal clicks. If gender is isolated as a variable, yes, the overall mood seems to be against men.
>if you hate men pretending to be and demanding equal treatment to women you hate men
But why would you want equal treatment to women? Because they're treated better, right? Why is that?
>So you think they contain manly men? Both seem rather emasculate to me.
I'm not talking about behavior, I'm talking about physical traits.
>Hating transvestites goes back hundreds, if not thousands of years.
Yes, but why
? Polly Oliver's a hero, but the reverse isn't- why is that?
>That is because the role of the fighter has in almost all cases been filled solely with men.
This is an interesting thing to point out, because it ties in with some other theories I have about this whole thing.
>your pill has gaping holes
I'm saying that the women-are-wonderful effect exists. It has been proven to exist, so I'm very confident that I'm right.